Our Ethos & Editorial Commitment

In the world of gastronomic and epicurean journalism, integrity and impartiality are paramount. As editors of an epicurean magazine, we believe that our readers deserve evaluations that are free from bias, personal interests, or industry favoritism. This is why we staunchly defend the practice of anonymous writing when it comes to restaurant reviews, food critiques, and culinary explorations. The food and hospitality industry is deeply interconnected, with critics, chefs, restaurateurs, and industry insiders frequently crossing paths. This reality creates an environment where personal relationships can, even unintentionally, blur professional judgment. All too often, the projects of friends and acquaintances receive undue praise, not necessarily because of their inherent merit, but due to personal connections that influence critics. Such practices ultimately mislead the readers, distorting their expectations and diminishing the credibility of food journalism as a whole.

​

 This approach shields our editorial coverage from the pressure of industry networking and prevents undue influence from relationships that could cloud objectivity, as our readers turn to us for honest and insightful perspectives. They trust that we provide evaluations that are independent, unswayed by the need to maintain friendships or professional alliances. Upholding anonymity is not an act of detachment, but rather a commitment to authenticity and fairness, ensuring that every restaurant, chef, and culinary initiative is judged on its own merits.

​

In an industry where reputation is currency, our responsibility is to those who read us, trust us, and rely on us to guide them through the culinary world with honesty and integrity. And that is why we stand firm in our defense of anonymous writing.